Melania Trump’s Insulting Advice to America’s Wives

What is “nagging?” It depends whom you ask. If you ask a husband (my own declined to comment for this piece; “It’s a trap!” he said) they might answer: “It’s when my wife badgers me over, and over, and over to do something.” A wife might define the term in this manner: “It’s what I have to do in order to get my husband to do basic tasks in our house and in our lives, which involves constant and sometimes creative ways to send reminders.” Everyone would likely agree that it’s something that tends to happen in long-term relationships.

What would a marriage without nagging look like, and how could one attain it? Evidently the Trumps—Donald and Melania—have figured it out.

In an old interview recently unearthed by BuzzFeed, Donald Trump explained his approach to marriage. “There’s a lot of women out there that demand that the husband act like the wife and you know there’s a lot of husbands that listen to that,” Trump said, when asked if he’d ever changed a diaper for one of his five children. Not the Donald. He leaves domestic duties to others. Melania confirmed this in a more recent interview with Parenting magazine: “He didn’t change diapers and I am completely fine with that. . . we know our roles.”

Her role, evidently, is never to bother Donald with domestic responsibilities or, heaven forbid, nag him. Melania recently told GQ magazine she was neither “needy” or “nagging,” and then repeated this self-assessment to The New Yorker: “I’m not a nagging wife.”

Trump’s history of misogyny is long and well-documented. Many people wonder how it’s possible that a woman, let alone three women, have decided to hitch their fates to a man like Trump. The answer becomes clear in Melania’s interviews: like her husband, Melania is used to outsourcing a lot of the daily drudgery of life; and she doesn’t think that highly of her fellow women who don’t have the same privilege.

But as Hannah Sieglson writes in Slate:

The 2013 American Time Use Survey found that employed married women spend almost twice as much time on housework and child care (2.6 hours a day) as their husbands do (1.4 hours a day). While men are pitching in more (the amount of housework done by men has doubled between 1976 and 2005, according to the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan), women still have a longer second shift, which might leave them to grumble and carp—that is, nag—about what they need taken off their plate.

With women now in the workforce doing their share of breadwinning for the family, domesticity and parenting tasks need to become more balanced. We might not want our men to wear an apron and make dinner, but we do need a sous chef chopping vegetables to help get that dinner on the table, or someone to pitch in running errands. Just because we’re told we should do it all doesn’t mean we want to, or can, for that matter.

Technology has improved our lives drastically on this front; I have friends who use scheduled email services like Boomerang to send an email to ask a husband to do something, and then schedule several reminders at the same time to be sent at certain intervals after the arrival of the initial email. My husband and I use an iPhone app, “Remember the Milk,” to share tasks between us so that picking up dry cleaning and paying bills doesn’t fall between the cracks of busy lives.

But few American wives enjoy the privilege of having a full-time domestic staff at their beck and call like Melania does; for many of us, our “household help” consists of our husbands (and sometimes our older kids). So most mothers, when asked about their ideal working arrangements, prefer part-time to full-time hours. Mothering and housekeeping are full-time jobs, and understandably most women (myself included) prefer not to add another full-time job to that stack of responsibilities. Unfortunately for many people, taking a salary cut to pursue part-time work isn’t feasible. Which is why more men and women are trying to achieve a more equitable distribution of household responsibilities.

Most Americans understand this reality. Women don’t nag because they like to or want to emasculate their husbands (why would anyone want to emasculate the man they’re sleeping with?). They do it because of the overwhelming pressure they feel in terms of time, money and energy placed on the shoulders of both members of most American households.

This reality seems to have escaped the Trumps. In their view, all it takes are a few personal assistants, cleaning women and a chef. Hire a staff, and the ignoble reign of wifely nagging will end!  Does that make the Trumps more enlightened than the rest of us? Of course not; it just makes them a lot wealthier.

It also makes them sound very out of touch with the concerns of most Americans. Melania’s “Let them use servants” approach to the very real time pressure Americans face isn’t likely to improve anyone’s image of her or her husband. Is this the kind of couple we want in the White House, one that not only doesn’t understand this mundane type of stress, but also chooses to criticize women for the way they keep their households running? Melania might not nag, but she also doesn’t have the first clue what American women—and American wives—need or want.


  • GinaRD

    Excellent points.

  • BeccaLeigh

    Trump supporters make it sound as though he’s just worked hard for all he has so he understands. That’s nonsense! His father took advantage of every single taxpayer dollar available in subsidies, grants, etc. and eventually, Congress investigated him for misuse of public funds (not sure of all the circumstances). His father needed to revamp his business dealings so he made Donald the new head of the company (in name only). Starting with Trump Towers, his dad co-signed every financial document and Donald inherited all of that when he died (about $250 million in assets). It’s not hard to make money on real estate at that time when you’re starting point is $250 million ahead of everyone else!!


    I don’t think she ever once said, “Let them have servants” so you’re guilty of libel.

  • GiveMeARaise

    The larger wisdom here is that when both spouses try to work full time, even small deficiencies in hubby’s housework efforts can become a big issue and cause major resentment. There can be a constant accounting and scrutinizing of “who does more” since each spouse’s day is so structured.

  • Someone must bring a dollop of realism to this subject, and it appears the task will be mine.

    Miss Mandel’s contentions are almost entirely false. Unless the wife’s income makes the difference between meeting the family’s bills and going under, her job is discretionary. That being the case, her decision to work for wages is hers alone. If she married under the impression that she has the right to demand that her husband see to anything but the traditional male half of the chores – and in case you’re in any doubt about what those are, they’re the dirty, backbreaking ones: home maintenance, car maintenance, yard work, garbage detail, and coping with the pets’ excreta — she’s seriously deluded and should not have married. The domestic chores are properly hers. If she can hire them done out of her income, fine. Otherwise, that’s the marital bargain: he provides, protects, and deals with the unpleasant jobs and the ones that require male muscle; she deals with the kids, the housecleaning, the cooking, and stocking the larder.

    Can she ask him to “pick up X on the way home?” Certainly, and he should do so cheerfully. Can she ask him to look after the minor children while she goes to the grocery store or attends to something out of the ordinary (e.g., a “girls’ night out”)? No problem. But in the normal course of affairs, those are her responsibilities.

    Some demanding women manage to have it both ways: he provides, protects, does the dirty stuff and sees to the domestic chores as well; she does only what she pleases. But any man who’s willing to settle for that deserves what he certain to get: a life of subservience to a lazy woman who’ll gradually shed all her responsibilities onto his shoulders.

  • Miss E

    Though I’m not a Trump fan this hit piece is rather pathetic. “The answer becomes clear in Melania’s interviews: like her husband, Melania is used to outsourcing a lot of the daily drudgery of life; and she doesn’t think that highly of her fellow women who don’t have the same privilege.” Where does Mandel give ANY evidence of this? The Vanity Fair source Mandel gives, which is also poorly written, says Melania has an assistant and a chef. I don’t see where Melania “doesn’t think highly” of anyone. Nice hit piece. (eye roll)

  • Mark

    So, basically, Bethany is a nagging bitch with zero self-awareness and whose marriage is failing.

  • Pingback: Is Donald Trump A Victim of Predatory Women? | sitting on the edge of the sandbox, biting my tongue()

  • Pingback: CONSERVATISM FOUND MURDERED ... Prime Suspect Still At Large! ⋆ Doug Giles ⋆ #ClashDaily()

  • Wahoo4480

    This ‘article’ is a blatant hatchet job.