Is This Satan’s—and Feminists’—Favorite Movie?

2b0fd2a885220c09e6b23a9dae13a1b8b2c5a3c0

Millions of Americans are fascinated by horror-filled, demonic movies (remember The Exorcist?). Although admittedly a “niche market,” the supernatural thriller genre has become a big moneymaker for movie studios. As well, many directors make their creative debut behind the lens of such movies because these are the films that studios will entrust to otherwise unproven talent.

Consider the new spiritually infused thriller, The Witch.

ARVE Error: id and provider shortcodes attributes are mandatory for old shortcodes. It is recommended to switch to new shortcodes that need only url

 

First-time director Robert Eggers’ horrifying tale of a Puritan-era family that encounters unexplainable, evil forces in the woods near their rural New England farm won him the “Best Director” prize at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival. A24 Films—the same people who brought you Ex Machina and Room—purchased The Witch (which had a $3.5 million budget) last year and is undoubtedly pleased with a $9 million opening weekend for such a “small” movie.

But putting aside the impressive financial success of The Witch, what jumps out to even the casual observer is the film’s unusual marketing strategy.

Wired.com called the film “sinister, smart, and wildly feminist”:

The Witch is the kind of horror film diehard genre fans constantly hunger for, but rarely get. That’s because while it’s as unsettling as any scary movie should be, writer-director Robert Eggers’ first feature is also smarter than much of its ilk—blending old-time religion with modern feminist ideas in a way that can be totally missed if you’re not looking, and greedily devoured if you are.

Because there’s nothing fans of the horror genre want more than “wildly feminist” content!

But wait—it gets even better. To work up strong pre-release buzz for The Witch, A24 Films partnered with the Satanic Temple and its “spokesperson” (spokeswitch?) Jex Blackmore.

The idea of the witch as any sort of female outsider, Blackmore says, “actually did a lot of harm to our society.” To point out that harm, and how it’s still present in the treatment of women today, the Satanic Temple partnered with The Witch’s distributor, A24, to host a series of screenings and performances—dubbed the Sabbat Cycle—in New York, Los Angeles, Texas, and Detroit. The Temple—which, it should be noted, is a non-theistic organization more aligned with issues like reproductive rights and same-sex marriage than the Devil himself—hopes to use the film to explore the ties between historical and modern bigotry and inspire a “Satanic uprising.”

“As Satanists, we are ever mindful of the plight of women and outsiders throughout history who suffered under the hammer of theocracy and yet fought to empower themselves,” Blackmore said when announcing the Satanic Temple’s support of the film. “While the patriarchy makes witches of only the most socially vulnerable members of society, Eggers’ film refuses to construct a victim narrative. Instead it features a declaration of feminine independence.”

So if “wildly feminist” story arcs aren’t your bag, but worshiping Lucifer (via your support for reproductive rights) is, then this is your kind of movie.

To be fair, movie studios now seek out partnerships and endorsements from churches and religious leaders when one of their faith-based films is about to be released. In the free marketplace of ideas and commerce, there’s nothing wrong with a private film company choosing to partner with the Satanic Temple for the release of their new “We’ll show those Bible-thumping, chauvinistic, horror-film-making predecessors of ours!” movie.

But we also don’t have to pay to watch it. And you shouldn’t.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

newsletter-signup
  • I saw the trailer for this a few weeks ago, and it was extremely unsettling, which I’m sure was by design.

  • Jason Storck

    The movie actually ends up being a pretty good exploration of Calvinist religious concepts wrapped around the implosion of a family pushed to their limits by their hubris.

    • thesteelguy

      the ironic thing about that ‘feminist’ movie was that – in trying to decry and caricature Christian Puritanism in the wake of the triumphant’s Witch’s story, they indeed had to assert the existence of the feminine evil.

  • roastytoasty

    “In the free marketplace of ideas and commerce, there’s nothing wrong
    with a private film company choosing to partner with the Satanic Temple…”
    Yes there is something wrong with it: the very idea that publicity & tacit approval are being given to human beings who are accommodating themselves to and consorting with the Prince of Darkness is a clear sign of moral & cultural degeneracy.

    “We sit by and watch the Barbarian. In the long stretches of peace we are not afraid. We are tickled by his irreverence. His comic inversion of our old certitudes and fixed creeds refreshes us and we laugh. But as we laugh we are watched by large and awful faces from beyond and on those faces there is no smile.” ~Hilaire Belloc

  • Drunk Uncle

    I’m late to the party, but I needed to say that this movie was terrible. Worst I’ve ever seen. There is nothing scary about it.